• Skip to main content

Levinson and Stefani Injury Lawyers

Client-first legal representation for injury victims. Injured? Free Consultation:

(312) 376-3812

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Attorneys
      • Ken Levinson
      • Jay Stefani
      • Vanessa A. Gebka
    • Practice Areas
      • Truck Crashes
      • Bus Collisions
      • Auto Accidents
      • Child Injuries
  • Firm News
  • Library
    • Articles
    • Cases
    • Law
    • Video
  • Blog
  • For Lawyers
    • Focus Groups
  • Free Case Review

Lake Shore Drive

Alderman Hopkins Pushes Toward a Plan to Rebuild Lake Shore Drive

November 10, 2019 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

CHICAGO – Alderman Brian Hopkins (2nd) is currently pressuring the city to start massive movement on its long-awaited plan of adding new parkland off of Lake Shore Drive, as well as implementing a solution to an inefficient lakefront intersection at Chicago Avenue.

Hopkins is working toward a resolution that would completely rebuild–not just repave–The Drive and add 70 acres of parkland to its east.

It would also aim to expand Oak Street Beach.

Hopkins’ ward covers the stretch from the Downtown lakefront to Bucktown. Regarding his proposals, he has been requesting support from Governor J.B. Pritzker.

“The $45 billion capital bill is out there,” Hopkins explained. “And we don’t know what that’s going to be spent on. I’m pushing for this plan to finally come to fruition and get it off the drawing board.”

The alderman is also asking for a resolution to the inconvenient traffic backups caused at the Lake Shore Drive/Chicago Avenue intersection, where eastbound vehicles traveling from Streeterville make for an excessively long red light wait time in all four directions, while cars only get a few seconds to move once the light finally turns green.

“If you were a traffic engineer,” Hopkins said, “you would be fired for proposing this today. It’s just that bad.”

The resolution would also work to create a path allowing Chicago Avenue traffic to pass over Lake Shore Drive, along with with on-ramps and off-ramps to make for easier maneuvers on and off of The Drive–which would ideally no longer back up traffic.

“We really have no choice,” explained Hopkins. “We have to do something. Lake Shore Drive is crumbling. It needs to be replaced. The roadbed is beyond its useful service life. And as long as we’re rebuilding Lake Shore Drive, I think it would be a tragic waste of opportunity if we don’t also expand the parkland there.”

As of now, Lake Shore Drive has sparse greenery and boasts mostly concrete walkways and bike lanes on its sides. Hopkins’ plan would include new landfill to expand into the lake for additional parkland along the roadway.

The Drive is also under constant threat of flooding by Lake Michigan.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot has been working to add Jersey barriers to hold back rising water along the lake, but Hopkins believes this is impractical.

“It’s not going to work,” Hopkins told the City Club of Chicago late last month. “The types of erosion we’re seeing through climate change, fluctuating lake levels…we can’t get out of the way of this with Jersey walls. We have to rebuild Lake Shore Drive.”

Hopkins is waiting for much more momentum to come with the new administration in Springfield. 

His project would also put into place a long-running campaign to fix Lake Shore Drive’s S-shaped curve around Oak Street Beach. This development aligns with Meigs Field’s conversion to a Northerly Island nature preservation, as well as with Downtown’s Museum Campus completion that sits just off of The Drive.

Chicago architect Daniel Burnham, who helped to write the “Plan of Chicago” in 1909, deemed the city’s shoreline “forever open, clear and free,” which has been publicly mandated since 1836.

18 years ago, a group of cyclists established the Campaign for a Free and Clear Lakefront in honor of Burnham’s vision–they wanted the city to remove Lake Shore Drive entirely and return it to its origins as a grassy park space. In their eyes, such a large separation between Chicagoans and Lake Michigan was in direct violation of Burnham’s ideals.

It seems they weren’t far off base.

The ‘North Lake Shore Drive project,’ has been a collaboration between the Chicago and Illinois departments of transportation, the Chicago Park District, the Federal Highway Administration, and various neighborhood groups since 2013.

Safer and more efficient roadways, a renovated drive, and new parklands are possible, but these improvements will need backing, funding, and teamwork between government groups and Chicago locals.

Alderman Hopkins’ fight is a powerful reminder of the reimagining that is needed for Lake Shore Drive–better parks and more beach space are what will allow Chicago’s lakefront to remain a scenic legacy. It won’t be enough just to prevent it from falling apart.

Makeover coming for Lake Shore Drive?

July 12, 2017 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

Oak Street Beach, Photo: Google Maps

If you’re a fan of public parks and bike trails, a new proposal to expand the city’s lakefront is welcome news.

Crain’s Greg Hinz unveiled a series of renderings this morning in advance of a public forum at DePaul University, where state and city transportation officials will discuss ideas for altering North Lake Shore Drive, one of which allows for an expansion of public access in areas that are currently well populated.

Among the highlights from the Crain’s story is a significant alteration of Oak Street Beach, using lakefill to expand the beachfront hundreds of feet northeast. Running parallel to the beach would be a major new park that extends a mile past North Avenue. A bike path and a pedestrian path are also featured in the renderings and a proposed pedestrian/bike ramp connecting Lake Shore Drive to the Lincoln Park Boat Club.

Two prospective (and welcome) features: A retaining wall at the Belmont Avenue exit ramp, where auto and pedestrian traffic often intersect; and an overpass at Chicago Avenue that would replace a stop light to improve traffic flow.

More from Crain’s:

Two different versions of the plan feature a formal pedestrian promenade from the nearby Streeterville neighborhood to the beach, or a combined entrance for those on foot and on bicycles. Under either scenario, the current at-grade Chicago Avenue entrance to the drive would be replaced with an overpass, eliminating a stop light that slows traffic.

Remaining on the table are either expanding or shrinking the drive, likely with some lanes set aside for buses or other high-occupancy vehicles.

Hinz reports that officials are hoping to finalize a concept by 2020, then figure out how to pay for it. It’s already drumming up lots of chatter among readers, a lot of whom are non-too-pleased with the prospect of planning for renovations without figuring out how to pay for it first. But as always, we believe that improving the safety and security of pedestrians is worth considering, even as the city and state struggle with many lingering budgetary problems.

Why the makeover matters: While some clamor for the planning and the prospective money to be used for things like the pension crisis and Chicago Public Schools, there’s something to be said for improving and maintaining the city’s infrastructure. These are long-term plans with potentially long-term benefits, and while the CPS is certainly a matter that needs attention, so too are the oft-traveled roads and public parks that keep the city functioning on a basic level. As more Illinois residents leave for ostensibly greener pastures, we need to find ways to keep people here. And keep them safe. That includes all neighborhoods—not just the north side.

This is just a concept plan: It’s important to remember that anything discussed at DePaul later this afternoon is a preliminary discussion of what the city hopes to accomplish. There’s certainly a chance that nothing gets done quickly because, as we said above, more pressing matters come to a head and the subject of money becomes a heated point of contention. As we’re seeing from the Crain’s story, the majority commenters believe any makeover of lakeshore—whether for monetary reasons or aesthetic reasons—is a bad idea.

We’re here to say, give it a chance: The public sometimes woefully underestimates the need to improve our city’s infrastructure for the sake of tradition or what we’ve become accustomed to. A few commenters mentioned that people “love Oak Street Beach” and don’t want to see it changed. But if the reason is strictly because people love playing volleyball and the buildings make for a nice backdrop, the rationale rings a tad shallow. Seems the argument for the status quo needs to be stronger than that.

Voice your opinion: The meeting takes place today at DePaul University’s Student Center, 2250 N. Sheffield, between 3-10 p.m.

Levinson and Stefani Injury Lawyers in Chicago / Attorney Advertising