scooters

E-Scooters Returning to Chicago

March 29, 2020 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

After a widely covered 4-month test run of Chicago’s pilot scooter program, the city has officially announced that the controversial and efficient scooters will be returning at some point in 2020. The second pilot, which has yet to be given a start date, will certainly bring about more polarizing opinions regarding whether this new transit method should stay for good or officially be banned by the city. As we have written in the past, the lack of regulations for these scooters render those who use them incredibly vulnerable. Coupled with the fact that most often these scooters are being used in bicycle lanes, this not only places the riders at risk, but it places bicyclists in harm’s way as these scooters can ride up to 15mph in the city.

After the initial 2019 pilot program ended in October of 2019, the Transportation and Business Affairs and Consumer Protection departments of the City released a report establishing that during the length of the pilot program there were 821,615 trips logged on the scooters. Of that large number of rides, 192 injuries requiring trips to the hospital were reported. After seeing this disparity, you may believe that the numbers are far too low for people to be skeptical of adopting scooters in the city. Afterall, over 821,000 rides is significant for a 4-month pilot program. However, those numbers must not deceive us. By the city adopting another method of transportation and allowing for it to take place without any strict rules or regulations, it places Chicago residents at a severe disadvantage and adds another dimension to what is already a fragile infrastructure that is growing denser. Included in the report released by the City was a survey that found that the most significant negative feedback centered around both safety and parking, and for good reason. True, these scooters offer an efficient and individual commuting experience that many who aren’t willing to ride a bike to work or school can easily get on board with. But at what cost? Why risk putting yourself in danger when the city has yet to establish any real safeguards?

This argument does not serve the function of holding that the scooters should be completely banned. Chicago faces a real issue when it comes to traffic congestion and as we all know, traffic congestion raises the cost of maintenance on vehicles, but also increases the likelihood for situations that have dangerous ramifications. With that being said, scooters have proven, through the 2019 pilot run, that they serve a purpose. There is no denying that over 800,000 rides were logged in a 4-month period. As impressive as that number is, it simply cannot take away from the fact that nearly 200 riders were injured in those 4 months. There’s a reason cities are beginning to heavily regulate scooter use and many have issued temporary bans. Why regulate all other forms of transportation in Chicago and fail to adequately establish appropriate standards of care for scooters? The fact that they are relatively new should not be an excuse.

Turning towards the future, Curbed Chicago was able to obtain a statement from Stefan Shaffer, City Strategist for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), in which he stated “as Chicago wrestles with its response to traffic congestion, air pollution and climate change, the e-scooter pilot gave people a popular and low-cost option to ditch their cars, which should continue.” Further, Mr. Shaffer also went into detail in an article published by the NRDC in which the e-scooter program was again touted for the safety precautions the city took. “Before the program began in June, the City met with various community leaders, disability rights advocates, transportation groups and other stakeholders to ensure the scooter pilot would enhance mobility for residents. The City’s extensive regulations and preparedness for issues with the scooters ultimately contributed to the low number of incident reports and injuries over the 800,000 rides taken during the pilot.” For what it’s worth, Mr. Shaffer is not wrong, in fact it has been good to see that the scooters were implemented into the city and so many rides were taken. However, one cannot help but argue that when it came to city regulations and enforcement, the pilot program had plenty of areas to be addressed. Before we go “all-in” and hold that scooters deserve the same amount of space in public transit as bicycles, properly enforcing the abundant number of scooters left in the middle of sidewalks, riders taking scooters outside the appropriate zones, and use of scooters in streets, should be an absolute priority.

As a City, we should want a diverse experience for all residents and that includes transportation options that are affordable and convenient. However, even in instances where the City is “testing” whether to adopt certain approaches to alleviate traffic congestion, rider and pedestrian safety should remain the first priority and not be sidestepped because a new form of transit proved to be efficient. In fact, one should truly begin to ask questions about what happens when these scooters are present throughout the long winter months. No matter what, safety should remain at the forefront of the discussion.

Data Suggests “Micromobility” May Alleviate Traffic Congestion; Serious Questions Linger Regarding Safety

September 25, 2019 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

A new report released by INRIX, a data analysis company that helps power the likes of Google Maps and Waze, suggests that Chicago may be one of the top cities to support “micromobility.” Many may be asking what “micromobility” even means, and for good reason. INRIX has actually coined the term and uses it to define modes of transportation, such as shared bikes, e-bikes, and e-scooters. The data company’s belief is that through the use and support of micromobility, cities may find a lot of potential in curbing traffic congestion in a cost effective and environmentally friendly way.

Supporting this idea and belief is data based on 50 million vehicles throughout the most congested cities in the United States, which found that 48% of all car trips are less than three miles long. INRIX’s belief is that this commuting length of less than three miles is precisely where micromobility can make a change on cities throughout the United States.

In using this initial data, INRIX then turned to cities throughout the States to see where they had the most potential. In doing so, the company found that Honolulu, New Orleans, Nashville, and Chicago rounded out the top 4 of the group. It was found that 22% of Chicagoans driving was to go no further than a mile, while 17% of trips were for 1-2-mile trips, and only 12% of trips were 2-3 miles in length.

At first, this data appeared to speak for itself. Not only does it suggest the long-held belief that the more we commute through public transportation or via alternative means other than automobiles, the better traffic and congestion will be, but that there are endless amounts of data to support such a notion. However, a closer look reveals several questions that must be answered. How does city landscape and terrain affect the potential for successful micromobility options? How does a city properly fund maintaining and regulating such options? And most importantly, how do cities keep their residents safe? The latter being the most pressing concern amid a push for increased transportation.

While the data presented may paint a picture that this is a common sense move that more cities need to continue adopting and build around, the reality is that establishing infrastructure such as this is incredibly dangerous. The argument can easily be made that driving a vehicle is just as dangerous, but as we have continuously covered since the adoption of these scooter programs, riders are not gaining insurance coverage, placing them in horrible situations if they are ever seriously injured. Those extra minutes of sitting in traffic are worth it, if it means you aren’t running the risk of being injured because the city has not properly provided the necessary safety precautions. And that is precisely what the issue is today. As this data from INRIX suggests that cities like Chicago and Nashville are in great positions to adopt micromobility programs and implement them, it doesn’t really factor in safety or landscape into its decision making.

Cities Come in all Shapes and Sizes

Having lived in Nashville, the argument is pretty easy to make that a city with a crumbling public transportation system, with the inability to properly establish bike lanes, should probably not be the poster child for a micromobility platform. This is not to say that Nashville has issues that cannot be resolved, but there is so much more that needs to be addressed before a city can adopt transportation platforms like INRIX proposes. Take away infrastructure concerns for a moment and look to the overarching safety concerns. Nashville actually tested its own scooter program a year ago and quickly shut it down as a man was tragically killed.

Incidents such as the one that occurred in Nashville are happening all over the place. In Chicago, we also have had our share of incidents that have really made city officials pause and analyze if the pilot program is worth it. Not only are these topics that need to seriously be addressed before programs adopting micromobility can be fully adopted, but for us, it really comes down to protection for riders. While city regulations and safety ordinances help establish rules of the road for micromobility users, none of that matters if the person riding is unable to have his medical bills paid for due to the scooter or bike-sharing company failing to provide any sort of adequate coverage. This is a serious issue that needs to be addressed before cities even consider putting more people on the roads.

Although, we have serious reservations regarding any sort of implementation of these programs before coverage is provided for users, INRIX has provided its own Road Rules program that is meant to help cities navigate safe and efficient means to alleviate traffic congestion. Information such as this can be used to inform cities what is necessary to make micromobility a real factor throughout the States. The more information available for our city officials, the higher our safety standards for the place we call home should be.

In the News – Week of September 2nd

September 6, 2019 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

New Data Provides Further Insight on Chicago’s Scooters

A new study conducted by DePaul University researchers has discovered that the electric scooters the city recently adopted as part of a four-month long trial are now being used as legitimate choices for commuting during morning and evening rush hour periods. What was once deemed a fad that many cities throughout the United States were quickly shutting down due to safety hazards and an overall lack of regulations for the public has now shown that maybe they are more useful than originally thought. The study, which was done by the Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Planning, looked at 12 hours of data from a single day in the month of July. Ultimately, what this data was able to show was that in the roughly 2000 scooters trips that were taken in single day, a majority of the rides took place between 7-9am and 5-7pm.

As many in Chicago and the surrounding suburbs already know, traffic in the city can be grueling. Just like any large city, it seems that the traffic will simply never end. This new research seems to suggest that some individuals throughout the city may be turning from public transportation and vehicles altogether, and joining the scooter sharing fleet. Joseph P. Schwieterman, one of the researchers who conducted the study stated “I thought perhaps scooters were a novelty and people would use them in their leisure time, to make their social activities a little easier, but what we found is that rush hour is when most of the money is being made.” Such results from the pilot program are very important to note. While the scooters may seem like non-factor in the larger view of the city’s infrastructure as a whole, the reality is that people will go to great lengths to make their trips quicker in the morning and evening. While Chicago has clearly experienced the negatives associated with scooters, data such as this may begin changing people’s perspectives of the scooter sharing program altogether.

Of course, just because people are beginning to adopt the pilot program, does not mean it is in the best interest of city residents. As we have continuously covered, allowing scooters within city limits poses a severe risk to pedestrians and bicyclists in the city, as well as the scooter riders themselves. At this point, there have not been any developments regarding the most pressing issue – the fact that the scooter companies have failed to establish insurance coverage for riders. This effectively creates an insurance gap which could place riders in a dangerous and expensive situation if an accident were to occur. All of this is to say that while the scooters become more popular and the city becomes accustomed to seeing them, the city should also be making strides to make them much safer and establish further regulations that ensure that riders and the surrounding public are protected legally as well.

Lightfoot to Hold Town Hall on Budget Spending; Updates Expected Regarding the City’s Infrastructure

Mayor Lightfoot has announced that she will be holding several town hall meetings for Chicagoans in September 2019 to allow for open discussion regarding the City’s budget as a broader attempt to provide transparency to the city’s residents. One of the topics that will likely be discussed is how the city plans on spending the significant increase in funding it is set to receive as part of Governor Pritzker’s $45 billion capital plan that was announced in May of 2019.

We previously wrote on the plan’s overall impact on the crumbling infrastructure throughout the state, especially the roads and freeways connecting Chicago to the surrounding suburbs. Mayor Lightfoot’s townhall should hopefully provide some further updates on announced projects, such as the Kennedy Expressway reconstruction and the I-80 Ridge Road to Lincoln Highway rebuild. While these projects will likely take a significant amount of time to be completed, its important they are followed through as it was announced earlier in May that Illinois drivers were losing roughly $18.3 billion per year due to poor infrastructure and traffic.

Further, the City of Chicago has released a 2020 Budget Survey that asks city residents which areas of the budget should receive reduced or increased spending. If you are interested in attending any of the meetings, see below for further information:

6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, September 4 at the Copernicus Center on 5216 W. Lawrence Ave.
9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on Saturday, September 14 at Roberto Clemente High School on 1147 N. Western Ave.
6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 19 at Southeast United Methodist Youth and Community Center (The Zone) at 11731 S Ave.
6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 25 at Lindblom Math and Science Academy, 6130 S. Wolcott Ave.

Who Pays When a Scooter Hits a Pedestrian?

July 22, 2019 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

Have you ever read your entire auto insurance policy? It’s become a joke in the digital age that people click “Agree” whenever they encounter “Terms of Service” online without ever reading a word of what they just signed off on. This could be because these policies are written in such a way that they are difficult to understand. They are also, admittedly, pretty boring. Insurance declaration pages are no different. These documents are sometimes many pages long and can require some background knowledge to fully understand.

Insurance policies are contracts between the person buying insurance and the company providing coverage. The consumer pays a premium and the insurance company agrees to pay a claim incase an incident occurs, such as a car crash or house fire. Even with highly trained, experienced lawyers drafting these agreements, disputes can arise about what the words in an insurance policy really mean. A somewhat famous contract dispute case in Canada in the mid-2000’s resulted in a phone company losing a million dollars over a misplaced comma.

So, when non-lawyers enter into a contract to buy insurance from one of the multi-million dollar insurance companies that advertise all over the media with their amusing animal mascots and memorable jingles, there’s a good probability that they don’t read what they are signing, or they aren’t sure what some of it means.

The new motorized scooter companies popping up all over major cities throughout the U.S. in the last few years are taking a different approach altogether. They really aren’t providing any insurance coverage at all. Therefore, if a person rents a scooter and hits a pedestrian, they may not be covered.

A person injured by a negligent scooter rider will inevitably have medical bills they need to pay. If that person has health insurance, depending on the nuances of the coverage, and the deductible amount, hopefully the net, out-of-pocket cost of treatment will be relatively small compared to the total amount of the bills. That doesn’t account for potential lost wages, pain and suffering, disability, or loss of normal life.

When you rent a car, you might be covered by your own insurance policy if you opt-out of the one provided by the rental company. If you’re hit by a car as a pedestrian because the driver was negligent, for people who purchase car insurance in Illinois, you can turn to the un-insured motorist coverage of your auto policy to recoup your damages if the driver was uninsured. Since scooter renters generally aren’t getting the option to buy coverage to take advantage of this new transportation fad, if they happen to hit a pedestrian or cause damage to a car, they’ll most likely have to pay the damages out of pocket. If they don’t have the money or assets to do so, they may be able to discharge their obligation to pay if they file for bankruptcy, leaving the victim to eat the cost of a harm they did not cause themselves.

The solution, of course, is for the scooter companies to provide insurance for their riders. Like the terms of service in the rental agreement itself, people may not read those policies. However, if something happens, victims of crashes won’t be left to pay their own bills. If the companies don’t decide, out of the kindness of their hearts, to voluntarily provide insurance coverage, legislators, either on a local municipal level, or in state capitals, should require them to do so.

As technology changes and new ways to get around start popping up, we have to make sure that lawmakers and the insurance industry fill gaps where we may not have anticipated them before. If this delays progress, so be it. Transportation should be reasonably regulated and as cost efficiently as possible to increase safety and to make sure there is a way to compensate people who are hurt if someone is negligent in operating a vehicle no matter how big or small it is.

In the News – Week of June 8th

July 12, 2019 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

City Seeking Feedback on Pilot Scooter Program

In light of the city’s recent start to its four-month pilot scooter program, the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection (BACP) is asking for residents of Chicago to report any scooter issues they see. According to Curbed – Chicago, individuals may use the 311 website or mobile app to report their concerns. To report an issue, go to the website and find the “E-Scooter” category, from there you will be able to report your issue.

As we have previously written, the introduction of Chicago’s pilot scooter program has gotten off to a very troubled start. Not only have there been countless reports of misconduct with the scooters, but the scooters are already proving to be far more dangerous than many believe them to be. Last month, just within weeks of the launch of the scooter program, a pedestrian was actually hit by an e-scooter rider in the city. As a result of the accident, he was found unresponsive and now has trouble speaking after being forced to undergo a procedure to his jaw. Ultimately, this is to say that the scooters are continuing to pose a significant risk not only scooter riders, but pedestrians as well. Be sure to report if you see any issues in your neighborhood as the more we can make city officials aware of misconduct, the safer both riders and pedestrians will be.

Divvy Set to Expand to the Far South Side

As reported by the Chicago Tribune, Divvy bikes in now set to begin expanding to the Far South Side after Lyft invested $50 million into the bike-sharing system. In addition, Lyft has decided to add 10,500 new electric-assist bikes to the city. This is big news for the entire city as it means that bike-sharing will now seek to cover each area of the city, essentially providing forms of transportation sharing ranging from ride-share, bike-share, and more recently, scooter-share. What’s more, it appears the city is inclined to ensure that these bikes are appropriately placed and integrated into new areas throughout the city with specific intent, rather than just to provide a mere presence.

The Chicago Tribune had the opportunity to speak with Sue Hofer, a spokeswoman for the Chicago Department of Transportation. Sue stated, “We’re going to community meetings, where people will say, ‘I think it makes more sense in front of the grocery store than in front of the bar.’” Overall, we can hope that the more communities are involved prior to the installation of these docking stations, the safer the process will be. At this time, the initial community meetings have yet to secure select dates and times for the community to gather.

Chicago is Already Experiencing Issues with E-Scooters

July 1, 2019 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

Within its first week as part of a 4-month long pilot program, Chicagoans took over 60,000 rides on the city’s new e-scooters throughout various neighborhoods of city. Since its unveiling, there has already been a large number of complaints regarding the scooters. The city’s Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection (BACP) alone has received 45 complaints since the program first began. With that being said, it’s not as if the complaints aren’t valid. Many in Chicago are seeing scooters piled up on sidewalks, forcing pedestrians to weave throughout foot traffic. In a city of three million people, issues such as these, which may seem small at the moment, exacerbate the problem. Based on the Chicago Department of Transportation’s “E-Scooter Do’s & Don’ts,” riders are instructed to “park scooters with care.” Unfortunately, with no clear oversight due to such a high volume of pedestrian, bike, and auto traffic already in the fold, scooters may just be too difficult to track and regulate.

As the media has been reporting throughout the United States regarding cities entering pilot programs, it has become clear Chicago is not alone. Unfortunately, some of the cities that have been experiencing major issues, accidents, and even fatalities, have far stricter rules than Chicago. The only mandate in Chicago is placed on the time of day a person may ride the scooters and specific areas where riding is banned. However, if you do decide to take the plunge and try out Chicago’s new e-scooter program, be smart about it and possibly take some training courses. Lime, one of the e-scooter providers for Chicago’s pilot program, is offering “First Ride Academy” courses, which aim to provide first-time riders with scooter safety information and tips on how to park scooters responsibly throughout the city. Details on the courses can be found below:

Location: West Palmer Square Chicago, IL 60647

Dates: Every Saturday, June 29 – July 27

Tickets: Click here

A growing trend

As overall interest in scooters has grown, there has clearly been a rise in the number of accidents and injuries, as expected. However, after seeing such a high number of fatalities increase as a result of these scooters, cities must ask if it is worth the risk. As reported at the beginning of June, “there are no comprehensive statistics available but a rough count by the Associated Press of media reports turned up at least 11 electric scooter rider deaths in the U.S. since the beginning of 2018. Nine were on rented scooters and two on ones the victim owned.” The issue with the scooters is not that they are available for residents to use, it’s the fact that they are not heavily regulated, and they are not essential for transportation needs. Cities like Chicago already have established public transportation and bike systems to allow for individuals to safely navigate the city. These pilot programs force cities to integrate an entirely new mode of transportation on a mass scale into an already developed daily practice of commuting for millions of people.

Injuries are frequent

Although it appears the fatalities and injuries sustained from these recent accidents are outliers, new reports are showing scooter injuries to be much more prevalent than we thought. Earlier this month, U.S. News reported a new study conducted by the American Journal of Otolaryngology finding an increase of head injuries from riding electric scooters across the United States. According to U.S. News, “between 2008 and 2017, nearly 32,000 injuries were estimated nationwide, according to a review of records in the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance system. Accidents tripled from about 2,300 in 2008 to nearly 7,000 in 2017.” Not surprisingly, the most common injuries were concussions and brain bruising; however, this was largely due to the fact that 66% of the people injured failed to wear a helmet. What this information is telling us is that if cities fail to mandate certain safety equipment for riding scooters, the riders will not bother to wear helmets. Unfortunately, the injuries from these scooter crashes can be far more devastating. Though scooter riders in Chicago are limited to the bicycle lane, they can reach speeds of 15mph. Not requiring individuals to wear helmets under those circumstances is a risky proposition. That said, even if states or cities don’t require the use of safety equipment, we should all be doing ourselves a favor by putting a helmet on if we decide to join the scooter frenzy that’s now upon us.