• Skip to main content

Levinson and Stefani Injury Lawyers

Client-first legal representation for injury victims. Injured? Free Consultation:

(312) 376-3812

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Attorneys
      • Ken Levinson
      • Jay Stefani
      • Vanessa A. Gebka
    • Practice Areas
      • Truck Crashes
      • Bus Collisions
      • Auto Accidents
      • Child Injuries
  • Firm News
  • Library
    • Articles
    • Cases
    • Law
    • Video
  • Blog
  • For Lawyers
    • Focus Groups
  • Free Case Review

trucking legislation

$25 Million Directed to Infrastructure Speed Grants in Illinois

July 26, 2020 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

$25 million in grant funding is set to help expedited infrastructure project work, according to Illinois Governor Jay “J.B” Pritzker and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity.

These Rebuild Illinois funds will accelerate public infrastructure projects across Illinois that can begin as early as this summer–projects which would have faced extreme delays due to many local governments recently losing much-needed revenues. These losses are one effect of a heavy decrease in vehicle travel due to shelter-in-place orders in the wake of the coronavirus. The heaviest hit comes from toll fees and fuel taxes, and overall state transportation revenue is planned to decrease by about $50 billion throughout the next year and a half, according to The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

“This will keep key public infrastructure projects in the pipeline and will support the return of skilled labor to job sites for the busy summer season,” said Pritzker in his announcement last month. “Starting today, local governments with shovel-ready projects, including school districts, townships, and other entities, can apply for this funding.”

Those eligible for grants include local governments and public entities with important public infrastructure projects in the works that could begin within 90 days of receiving their funds. Projects eligible for funding must also be public assets, not have recurring expenses, and must be permanent. They must also meet “shovel-ready” guidelines and the Illinois’ Business Enterprise Program minority business participation requirements.

“This program is about putting people back on the job now,” said Tim Drea, President of Illinois AFL-CIO. “We applaud Governor Pritzker for being proactive and innovative. The return of every dollar spent on public works is another brick in rebuilding our economy, both in terms of jobs created and economic development created by improved infrastructure.”

Fast-Track grant source funding comes directly from Rebuild Illinois, which is a $45 billion plan passed to offer Illinois’ first comprehensive capital plan in over 10 years. DCEO is also spearheading multiple programs under Rebuild Illinois, such as funding new public works projects, investing in broadband capacity expansion, incentivizing business development, and other efforts that will work to promote economic growth throughout the state.

The grant program is one of multiple economic growth efforts implemented by DCEO to help promote economic health after the challenges of COVID-19, and is initiating relief programs that will allow over $100 million to become available to areas throughout Illinois. Some of these relief programs include: the Downstate Small Business Stabilization Program, the Emergency Small Business Loan Fund, Emergency Hospitality Grants, and other efforts that will serve communities and businesses in need.

“We recognize the unique challenge and burdens that COVID-19 is placing on us all, and we are taking steps to provide relief to businesses and communities,” said director of the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, Erin Guthrie. “Through the Fast-Track Public Infrastructure Grants program, the administration will provide a much-needed boost for works across the state as well as the critical infrastructure projects our state depends on.”

Fast-Track front-loads part of a Notice of Funding that will push forward available funds between $500,000 and $5 million. These grants will be dispersed on a rolling basis, and will be prioritized to areas that are most in need.

The main goal of these grants is to restore significant public works projects that may have been paused or cancelled due to COVID-19. These funds will be used toward projects like water and sewer system expansion, school modernization reinvestments, and bringing necessary updates to other public buildings. They will also help laborers return to work in time for the upcoming construction season.

Communities that may need more time or that do not currently have projects meeting the shovel-ready criteria can submit an application to receive a grant for remaining funds by the end of June. DCEO is also conducting a series of webinars with local governments to give more information on these new Fast-Track Grants. You can find a list of upcoming outreach efforts, as well as more small business resources, here.

Rural Transportation Faces Deficit Due to Pandemic

July 25, 2020 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

Due to the hit state revenue sources are facing from the COVID-19 pandemic, rural transportation is likely to have an overall funding deficit, according to The Road Information Program’s recent report.

The report, titled “Rural Connections: Challenges and Opportunities in America’s Heartland,” was released last month by TRIP, a nonprofit that focuses on transportation issue research and advocates for safety-centric policies for road travel.

The report explains a current $211 billion funding backlog for the country for necessary rural transportation system improvements and repairs.

Because road travel has declined so steeply in the wake of mandated shelter-in-place orders, state transportation sources of revenue have dwindled–namely tolls and fuel taxes. TRIP tweeted that transportation revenues were estimated to decrease by 30% ($50 billion) over the next 18 months because of low vehicle travel numbers.

According to TRIP’s executive director, Dave Kearby, the country’s fiscal wellbeing lies in the hands of rural transportation. “The health of the nation’s economy and the safety and quality of life in America’s small communities and rural areas ride on our rural transportation system” said Kearby. “The nation’s rural roads and bridges already faced a significant funding shortfall, and that will only be exacerbated by the looming reduction in state transportation revenues as a result of decreased vehicle travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

In addition to state budgets becoming depleted, sales taxes have also fallen as stay-at-home ordinances continue, and income tax revenue will not be expected until summer or fall due to the federal government’s extension of the income tax deadline. States have also had to reduce services, raise taxes, and furlough workers.

These struggles are particularly challenging for rural regions. Rural areas were largely excluded from policy debates regarding all three federal relief packages, besides some funding discussions on rural health care. When the CARES Act allocated $150 billion to the states and $30 billion to localities, many localities had to go without the aid they needed. Of that $30 billion, funds are only dispersed to cities with populations of 500,000 people or more. Because of this, rural communities have been at an overall disadvantage in resource access, and have been ignored when applying for emergency funding.

The TRIP report, after analyzing infrastructure data from each state, showed that roads and bridges in rural areas continue to have many deficiencies. As of 2018, 13% of major rural roads received a classification of being in poor condition, 21% were rated as being mediocre, and another 16% were classified as just “fair.”

The following year, the report saw 8% of bridges rated as either poor or structurally deficient in rural communities, with bridges having to indicate weight restrictions or limited access for large vehicles, including emergency service vehicles, school buses, agriculture equipment, and commercial trucks. An additional 47% of rural bridges were classified as being in fair condition, which meant that they had developed minor deterioration on the substructure, superstructure, or deck.

In addition, traffic crashes and crash fatalities were reported to be disproportionately high on rural roads, with a rate of more than twice that of other roadways. Non-interstate rural roads had an overall traffic fatality rate of two deaths per 100 million vehicles miles traveled in 2018–the same rating was .88 deaths for every 100 million vehicle miles traveled on all other roads.

Rural routes made up only 22% of all vehicle miles traveled that year, although crashes on these roads contributed to 40% of America’s traffic fatalities.

According to the report, these accidents may be caused by narrow lanes and shoulders, sharp turns, and other difficult driving conditions that often occur on rural roads. Still, farmers, energy producers, and manufacturers rely on rural transportation networks for entrance and exit points within the supply chain.

“Unfortunately, due primarily to a lack of investment over several decades, America’s infrastructure is in a dire state of rapid deterioration, and recent events show even more the importance of guaranteeing [that] food arrives where it needs to be,” said American Farm Bureau Federation president, Zippy Duvall.

These routes offer staggering challenges, then, with 66 cities having no direct–or safe–access to the Interstate Highway System.

“You cannot stock grocery stores, resupply medical facilities, and rebuild our economy on the backs of broken roads and aging bridges,” said Stephen Sandherr, Associated General Contractors of America CEO.

Because of this, America’s annual $28 billion investment by all government levels in rural road and bridge projects should be boosted by another 28%, according to TRIP. TRIP also advocates for property federal surface transportation program funding, as the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act expires this fall.

Transportation Providers Focus on Their Needs, Express Concern as Relief Bill Heads to Senate

July 24, 2020 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

Democrats in the House have released guidelines regarding the $3 trillion pandemic relief package.  In the Senate, there have been several appropriations bills senators have said may be considered this month. Congress will consider the 12 appropriations bills by the end of September. If funding measures are not enacted by the end of the fiscal year, or a continuing funding resolution plan is not approved, aspects of the federal apparatus will be shut down.

In the fiscal year of 2021, the White House has requested $21.6 billion in discretionary spending for the Department of Transportation, which would be a decrease of 13 percent from the previous year’s level. Mandatory contract authority and obligation limitations would receive $66.2 billion, which would be an increase of 8 percent. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration would receive an increase of almost 4 percent.

According to Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, this request would also bring $1 billion in infrastructure and freight grants.

“These programs provide federal assistance for critical projects that will spur progress in both rural and urban communities across all modes of surface transportation infrastructure: highways, transit, rail, and ports,” she said.

Still, industry groups are concerned that they are not receiving enough to recover.

Transit has asked for an additional $23.8 billion. It has only had a nod of $15.57 billion within the House bill, which also included $15 billion for highways from the general fund.

The motorcoach industry, which includes passenger buses, private transit, and charter buses, asked for $15 billion to help survive the time of the pandemic. The House bill gave $750 million in grants for intercity bus providers instead.

According to Peter Pantuso, American Bus Association President and CEO, this allocation is “a great start, but it’s not enough to save jobs and an industry that provides essential and diverse services to every walk of life in America.”

For the American Association of State Highway And Transportation, officials asked for $50 billion for direct emergency assistance to state transportation departments, a request which had support from 137 House members from both parties. The House instead gave state departments of transportation $15 billion. Executive director of AASHTO, Jim Tymon, said this is good news, although it isn’t what they asked for.

According to Tymon, many states have seen gas tax revenues drop significantly during the stay-at-home order implemented across the country. Because of this, state highway departments have had to pull back on proposed projects and furlough employees.

However, Tymon is hopeful that the House bill means more money will continue to come in. “We know we’ll still see states pull back on projects,” he said. Although they didn’t receive the $50 billion they originally asked for, the number of projects they’ll need to scale back “is a lot fewer than if the $15 billion wasn’t there.”

House Transportation Infrastructure Committee member, Rodney Davis, isn’t as convinced.

“$10 billion in a $3 trillion package for infrastructure?” he asked. “Seriously?”

Rep. David E. Price, chairman of the House Transportation-HUD Appropriations Subcommittee, defended the legislation. “A big part of the state and local aid goes [to] transportation,” he said. “That far outstrips any specific provisions.”

The American Trucking Associations is currently arguing for liability overhaul and tax relief, while the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association is pushing for measures such as driver compensation and hazard pay, as well as improved assistance for Small Business Administration. The group has also asked Congress for a suspension of heavy vehicle use tax and unified carrier registration fees.

Groups within the trucking industry that previously benefited from coronavirus spending bills are having to wait on asking for more.

According to John Bozzella, president and CEO at the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, the industry is not making a request, although a group of lawmakers from automaker states Ohio and Michigan have asked the House to focus on the U.S. auto industry for aid in the next bill.

He also said the $2 trillion coronavirus law brought liquidity for the industry that was needed, even though the current sales environment within trucking is in question.

A statement was released last month by the industry expressing concerns for the latest package, saying: “We are disheartened to see yet another massive aid package that is again lacking in assistance for our larger members and does not provide immediate liquidity relief for an industry in dire need. “

According to Fast Park’s Rob Chavez, the industry “has been decimated” and is unable to access help at the federal level. “It’s a month-to-month situation here,” Chavez said of his business, which is currently doing the work of 20 employees with just two. “It sounds almost ridiculous to say it, but companies weren’t built for no revenue.”

ATA Says Trucking Industry Has Key Role in Healing Nation’s Economy

July 8, 2020 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

According to American Trucking Associations President Chris Spear, the trucking industry as a whole is playing a key role in boosting the nation’s economy during this challenging time, and will be working with a White House commission to find necessary steps to take for the country to heal from this pandemic’s effects.

“On the transportation grouping, trucking is well-represented,” Spear said. “It’s got a number of carrier CEOS…that have a lot of presence around the country, and understand the economy from that perspective–not just as a [nation], but [at] a regional, state, and local level.”

Earlier this spring, Trump announced a list of many industry leaders that would help restart the economy as the pandemic begins to ease. These trucking companies include UPS Inc., FedEx Corp., J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc., and YRC Worldwide. These are some of the largest for-hire carriers in the country.

“They’re going to give us some ideas,” Trump said. He also mentioned, by name, that FedEX CEO Fred Smith and UPS CEO David Abney would be part of his administration’s Great American Economic Revival Initiative.

“I am honored to serve our president and the nation in this capacity, representing the trucking industry and joining four ATA member company CEOs, to bridge this crisis to a safe, speedy, and full recovery,” Spear said. “Just as they have during the mitigation and response efforts, truckers will be at the forefront as we revive our economy’s engine and get our country moving again. No industry will be more vital, and we embrace the opportunity to play a leading role in this national effort.”

Currently, economists are explaining that the United States has officially reached a recession with unemployment claims hitting 22 million within a span of three-weeks. Bob Costello, Chief Economist at ATA, is also saying that gross domestic product has the potential drop by 20% in the second quarter of the year–on an annual basis.

Returning the U.S. economy to normal will have to take place in stages, Spear said.

“It’s really an opportunity to help shape what this is going to look and feel like,” he explained. “Not just now, as we come out of the crisis, but how long that bridge needs to be from here to the recovery and how we do it safely.”

The process has already begun, but getting the economy back to a healthy place will take time, he explained further in a late April interview.

“It’s already stated. It started last week with the initial guidance that came out. There was a lot of talk last week on our first call with the president about testing, a lot of talk about staggering it. So, low-risk states and regions first and ending with the highest-risk states and regions last, and logistics is going to be a very important part of that, because we are essentially the glue that pastes all those groups together.”

Spear also said the regrowth could take a few months, but that the help from the trucking industry will help things move more smoothly.

“These are all people that will come to these calls not just identifying problems, but proposing concrete solutions and also putting a lot of resources towards getting these solutions done,” he said.

Other companies named by Trump to participate in the economy-building task force include JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Apple Inc., Exxon Mobil Corp., United Airlines Inc., and many others. Trump’s inclusion of trucking industry CEOs is appreciated by Spear, who said while he is grateful ATA members will be working to help the nation’s economy heal, there are still many challenges regarding fleets’ and drivers’ abilities to perform right now, and his team is working to find solutions.

“We’ve worked at the state level with the governors, especially in high-risk states, to shape policies that are not adverse to interstate commerce,” Spear said. “We need public rest stops open. We need the parking, the ability to rest, [the ability to] use the restroom, [to continue] working with our private truck stops to ensure their position, and [to continue] making available food. There are going to be bumps and bruises along the way. This is not easy. As roadblocks get thrown up in front of us, it’s our job to knock them down.”

Operation Safe Driver Week Will Happen as Planned, CVSA Says

June 23, 2020 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

This month, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance announced that its 2020 Operation Safe Driver Week would take place as scheduled–from July 12th to July 18th.

The CVSA did in fact postpone the International Roadcheck Inspection Campaign indefinitely, which was scheduled to occur from May 5th to May 7th, due to COVID-19 challenges, but said it has no plans to reschedule other safety enforcement efforts happening during the summer of 2020.

Additionally, Brake Safety Week is scheduled to go on as planned from August 23rd to the 29th.

During the weeklong initiative in July, law enforcement across the country will be on the lookout for any drivers operating vehicles in unsafe manners. 2020’s Safe Driver Week will have a focus on speeding, but any drivers showing unsafe driving will be pulled over by law enforcement personnel and potentially given a citation.

CVSA explained that speeding has become a much more prominent issue on the nation’s roadways over the past few months because roads have been so much clearer due to stay-at-home orders in place in response to COVID-19.

“It’s essential that this enforcement initiative, which focuses on identifying and deterring unsafe driving behaviors, such as speed, [goes] on as scheduled,” said Delaware State Police’s Sgt. John Samis, who is also president of CVSA. “As passenger vehicle drivers are limiting their travel to necessary trips and many commercial motor vehicle drivers are busy transporting vital goods to stores, it’s more important than ever to monitor our roadways for safe transport.”

Law enforcement will also be paying extra attention to other dangerous behaviors, including distracted driving, following too closely, reckless or aggressive driving, improper lane change, evidence of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, failure to use a seat belt, and failure to obey traffic control devices.

“According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, less traffic may be encouraging some drivers to ignore traffic safety laws, including speed limits,” said CVSA on its website. “Despite there being far fewer vehicles on the road due to COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, many jurisdictions are seeing a severe spike in speeding.”

CVSA explained that although the number of vehicles on the road decreased significantly throughout March and April, there was a sharp increase in average speeds measured during the first week of April in the largest metropolitan areas of the country. Recent data show average speeds in those areas increased by 75% in comparison to January and February.

New York City transportation officials reported a 60% increase in the number of March’s speed camera tickets compared to the same month in 2019–even though the amount of traffic during this time was down 90% in comparison to January.

Washington, D.C.’s traffic decreased by 80% between January and March, but officials still reported a 20% increase in speeding tickets during the month of March. The number of citations for driving 21 to 25 miles per hour over the speed limit rose by almost 40%.

In California, officials saw an increase in speeding violations and in crash severity, even though the California Highway Patrol’s overall call volume has decreased.

Tucson Police saw an increase of 40% in single-vehicle wrecks–which typically occur when a driver loses control due to excessive speed.

Other countries are experiencing similar issues. In Toronto, Ontario, Canada, police charged 18 different drivers with stunt driving at speeds between 80 and 106 miles per hour on the Don Valley Parkway, a freeway with a limit of 55 miles per hour, in just one weekend.

During the Operation Safe Driver Week of 2019, law enforcement issued 46,752 citations to passenger vehicle and commercial vehicle drivers. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Traffic Safety Facts report’s data from 2018 showed an increase in the number of fatal large truck-related crashes by 0.9%. On a positive note, the NHTSA also found a 2.4% decrease in overall fatalities.

“While, of course, we’re pleased to see a decrease in the overall number of fatalities, it was also devastating to learn that the number of fatalities involving large trucks increased,” Samis said. “Any increase whatsoever in roadway fatalities is unacceptable.”

The CVSA said it will continue to pay close attention to the circumstances around this pandemic and will announce the new dates for the International Roadcheck as soon as possible, and will update the status for Operation Safe Driver Week and Brake Safety Week if needed.

FMCSA Medical Advisors Re-Examine Driver Seizure Regulations

June 18, 2020 by Levinson and Stefani Leave a Comment

Changes may be coming soon for regulations regarding truck drivers with a history of seizures.

Currently, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s medical advisory board is working on implementing updates to its requirements for these drivers, and announced last month that it would be meeting at the end of April (in a virtual session) to discuss the potential of granting special exemptions for seizure-prone truckers.

The agency also planned to review its revision of the certified medical examiner’s handbook, a resource for physicians conducting exams on truckers and bus drivers, which has been in a stage of rewriting for years. The handbook is considered outdated, but is still widely used by physicians for procedure guidance.

According to Brian Morris, a medical review board member and director of surveillance for OccMed Consulting and Injury Care, today’s regulations disqualify a driver with a history of seizures automatically, and require a driver with this diagnosis to submit a complicated waiver to the FMCSA for the possibility of exemption.

“Tagging that diagnosis on somebody can be a career-ender, even if you’re doing a great job with your medications and not having seizures,” Morris explained. “It’s a throwback to years ago when the treatment for seizures was not that great. It was a good rule at the time, but times have changed, and there’s a whole segment of people out there that drive passenger cars and have been seizure-free for years.”

Morris said opening doors to the industry for these drivers is now a priority. “To be granted a seizure waiver is next to impossible. So, there’s a move afoot to find a way to clear those individuals to drive. We’re trying to figure out a way that we could have the regular medical examiners out there in the community clear individuals with seizures. If we can get proper documentation from a treating doctor that an individual is seizure-free on medication, I think the board would go along with it.”

At the recent medical review board meeting, the agency agreed that it would begin to review recurrence-related literature for truckers who have had at least one seizure, according to FMCSA’s medical programs decision chief, Christine Hydock. This fall, the agency will also bring in outside research on the issue of seizure-related disqualifications, as seeking an exemption can currently take months for approval.

Hydock said only around 300 drivers have been granted exemptions for their seizures.

“While the research is being conducted, the exemption program stays in place,” Hydock said. “Once it is finalized, we’ll make the determination whether or not the information supports moving forward, and how we would update the standard.”

Seizure exemption regulations currently require analysis of a trucker’s medical history, medications, and driving history from the past three years. FMCSA’s associate administrator for policy, Larry Minor, said the agency will continue its studies on the issue so that it can determine the possibility of going “forward with a rulemaking at some point in the future so we can update the seizure standard and get out of the seizure exemption program.”

Following future research, FMCSA also wants to review state driving criteria around seizure disorders for intrastate U.S. commercial vehicle drivers, review commercial vehicle regulatory and medical advisory criteria in relation to seizures in other countries, and conduct interviews with board-certified neurologists regarding overall medical information on seizures.

Additionally, the agency is contemplating whether it should eliminate the exemption requirement just as it did for the diabetes requirements in February of 2019.

In regards to the medical handbook revisions, Minor said changes will be released for public review. In the past, handbook revisions have been difficult, as board members often fail to present information as formal guidance when offering help to examiners.

“This is a constant struggle for the medical review board and medical examiners,” said manager of safety and occupational health policy for American Trucking Associations, Abigail Potter. “Federal regulations require a lot of medical examiners in that they have a lot of authority to interpret medical conditions on a very individual basis.”

One critic of a revised handbook is Natalie Hartenbaum, a doctor and occupational fitness expert who attends all medical board meetings.

“I think we’ve kind of lost our way because many of the [examiner] training programs teach only what was in the medical examiner handbook–that’s fortunately only taught as ‘this is the requirement,’” Hartenbaum said. “We got here because the clear delineation between this is regulation, this is official guidance, this is literature, this is current best practice all merged together. It really has not been pushed apart to make examiners really understand that. I really worry about the safety of the general public on the highways.”

As of now, the FMCSA plans to send the medical review board a report by September 2021 for consideration of these policy updates.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 23
  • Go to Next Page »

Levinson and Stefani Injury Lawyers in Chicago / Attorney Advertising